Taliban Talk Break Down

TALIBAN PEACE TALK BREAKS DOWN

The four members from government of Pakistan negotiating committee immediately cancelled a scheduled visit to Akora Khattak for a meeting with the Taliban committee. It is a unanimous decision.

It regrets to say that things are not moving in the right direction. Peace talks with Taliban are purposeless after the sad and condemnable murders.

The Taliban negotiating team has however regretted that the Akora Khattak meeting could not take place. It was close to reaching an understanding ceasefire but it is sad that the government of Pakistan called off the meeting after considering as Taliban.

It was also said by the government committee that military operation will only bring more bloodshed, displacement and terrorism to the country. It is not  a solution, said by the Taliban committee members, and added that both committees need to reestablish contacts and launch renewed efforts to end violence in the region.

The other committee members said both sides should exercises patience and restraint. It is said that they could not defend Taliban as many hands were active in the region. The Taliban committee was acting only as negotiators and it should not be made a party. They wished an early ceasefire could be agreed but it looked difficult after the latest developments.

Although the government of Pakistan seems in its public pronouncements to be taking a harder stance on the terrorists, continuing attacks while the pretence of talks continues, it is still far from clear whether it has seen the light and understood the logic of those who have been advocating action against the terrorists as a necessary condition for meaningful talks. So far the government of Pakistan has appeared on the back foot and the Taliban enjoying all the initiative both on the battlefield as well as in the political sphere. That may have changed and be changing daily with the unrelenting series of attacks the Taliban has been carrying out since the talks began. It has believed from the very outset of the talks effort that whether the government of Pakistan likes it or not, the Taliban will eventually force  it out of any illusions about the possibility of peace through talks along and force its hand vis-a tough action against the Taliban. The coming few days will tell if that moment has arrived or not, in any case whatever the timing of the almost inevitable military action against the Taliban the government and the military should put their heads together to prepare for the military operations and the anticipated retaliation by way of terrorist actions in the rest of the country.

Cancer in Pakistan

Cancer is still the most dangerous disease

80 million people die annually due to cancer of the mouth are mixed .

According to a report in Pakistan every five minutes , one hour, twelve and twenty-four hours, 288 people suffering from cancer are . Pakistan every year about one million cancer disease , and the subsequent year, 85 thousand of death are gone , including 40 huar ladies breast cancer and 8 thousand children cancer than die . while worldwide each year, an estimated 20 million people infected are . whom nearly 80 million patients timely diagnosis not being dead are gone . cancer resulting deaths 70 % belong to the developing world is . similar proportions worldwide deaths cancer deaths 23 are % .

Why is cancer ?

Why is cancer ? The real answer is probably to anyone but health experts agree that the main reason Genes taking place in variations . Foods found in some elements , such as stored grains found in aflatuksn Aflatoxins, rushing investment effects , electro -magnetic waves , viral , infections , air and water and food contamination , food chemicals , such as food coloring , genetically changed food , smoking , glass smoking , toxic smoke , and pesticides etc. . Besides, there are some reasons that cancer cause . , such as cement industry related people Asbestos chemical called cancer can be . female hearing password to stop hormone therapy cancer risk may increase . then Also rushing the rays of the sun are those who sit in the sun to much skin , especially those who are in danger of skin cancer kdmh .

Most Cancer found in Pakistan

The . Breast cancer. 2 . Mouth and lip cancer. 3 . Liver and tumor vessels leaves . 4 . Colon cancer . 5 . Prostate cancer. 6 . Brain cancer. 7 . Bladder 8 . Hucknzkynsr 9 . maintenance hucknz cancer. 0 a. cancer of the skin . always . Overy cancer . 2 a. lung cancer. 3 a. Cologne cancer. etc.

Breast Cancer

. usually ladies are suffering from the disease at the age of fifty-five , but ten years ago that women in Pakistan are usually in forty five years of age are suffering from cancer, breast cancer and Uri .

Breast Cancer Pakistan population ratio in the world, most cases occur . Estimated nearly 50 thousand annual deaths it caused Han . These women relative to this ratio there is less children two years

Lung cancer

The proportion of lung cancer in smokers is much higher . Cigarette smoking not only harms the smoker but also the people around him are indirectly affected by it . Smoking apart from cement particles and mining work related individuals even after many years of being cancer risk is phyphrun .

Liver cancer

are very efficient . hepatitis B or C infected people early so I could get my treatment of cancer is preventable .

Colon cancer &  Cancer Prevention

The most important rule to prevent cancer naturally , is balanced and simple life . , And avoid the unnatural lifestyle . Lifestyle of simplicity , to avoid too much fat foods , exercise , drugs of all kinds , especially betel , betel , avoid tobacco and gtky etc. , especially for prevention of liver cancer and hepatitis B vaccine Han . , women 's self-evaluation process plays an important role in breast cancer treatment is completed .

THREAT FOR WORLD PEACE

THE GREATEST THREAT FOR WORLD PEACE.

In some parts of the world the United States ranks even higher as a perceived menace to world peace, notably in the Middle East where overwhelming majorities regard the US and its close ally Israel as the major threats they face, not the US – Israeli favorite; Iran. Few Latin Americans are likely to question the judgment of Cuban nationalist hero. The further they draw  away from the United States the freer and more prosperous the Latin American people will be Marti’s judgment has been confirmed in recent years, once again by an analysis of poverty by the UN economic commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.

According to the UN surveys it is indicated that far reaching performs have sharply reduced poverty in Brazil, Uruguay, Venezuela and some other countries where US influence is slight but that it remains abysmal in others-namely those that have long been under US domination, like Guatemala and Honduras. Even in relatively wealthy Mexico, under the umbrella of the North American Free Trade agreement poverty is severe, with one million added to the numbers of the poor in 2013. Sometimes the reasons for the world’s concerns are obliquely recognized in the United States, as when former CIA director Michael Hayden, discussing Obama’s drone murder campaign, conceded that Right now there is not a government on the planet that agrees with our legal rationale for these operations except for Afghanistan and maybe Israel.

A normal country would be concerned by how it is viewed in the world. Certainly that would be true of a country committed to a decent respect to the opinions of mankind, to quote the Founding Fathers. But the United States is far from a normal country. It has had the most powerful economy in the world for a century, and has had no real challenge to its global hegemony since World War II, despite some decline partly self-administered. The US conscious of soft power, undertakes major campaigns of public diplomacy (aka propaganda) to create a favourable image, sometimes accompanied by worthwhile policies that are welcomed.

When the world persists in believing that the United States is by far the greatest threat to peace, the American press scarcely reports the fact. The ability to ignore unwanted facts is one of the prerogatives of unchallenged power.

A current example can be seen in the laments about the escalating Sunni-Shiite conflict that is tearing apart the Middle East, particularly in Iraq and Syria. The prevailing theme of US commentary is that this strife is a terrible consequence of the withdrawal of American forces from the region a lesson in the dangers of isolationism. The opposite is more nearly correct. The roots of the conflict within Islam are many and varied, but is cannot be seriously denied that the split was significantly exacerbated by the American and British led invasion of Iraq. And it can not be too often repeated that aggression was defined at the Nuremberg Trials as the supreme international crime, differing from others in that it encompasses all the evil that follows, including the current catastrophe.

When Mandela at last obtained his freedom, he declared that during all my years in prison, Cuba was an inspiration and Fidel Castro a tower of strength. What other country can point to a record of greater selflessness than Cuba has displayed in its relations to Africa? Today the names of Cubans who died defending Angola from US-backed South African aggression, defying American demands that they leave the country are inscribed on the Wall of Names in Pretoria’s Freedom Park. The thousands of Cuban aid workers who sustained Angola largely at Cuban expenses are also not forgotten.

The US approved version is quite different. From the first days after South Africa agreed to withdraw from illegally occupied Namibia in 1988 paving the way for the end of apartheid, the outcome was hailed by the Wall Street Journal as a splendid achievement of American diplomacy one of the most significant foreign policy achievements of the Reagan administration. The reasons why Mandela and South Africans perceive a radically different picture  are spelled out in PieroGleijeses masterful scholarly inquiry visions of Freedom. Havana, Washington, Pretoria and the Struggle for Southern Africa 1976-1991.

South Africa’s aggression and terrorism in Angola and its occupation of Namibia were ended by Cuban military might accompanied by fierce black resistance within South Africa and the courage of Namibian guerrillas. The Namibian liberation forces easily won fair elections as soon as these were possible. Similarly in elections in Angola the Cuban backed government prevailed while the United States continued to support vicious opposition terrorists there even after South Africa was compelled to back away. To the end the Reignites remained virtually alone in their strong support for the apartheid regime and its murderous depredations in neighboring countries. Though these shameful episodes may be wiped out of internal US history others are likely to understand Mandela’s words. In these and all too many other cases supreme power does provide protection against reality to a  point.

Peace Talk with Taliban Finished

PEACE TALKS WITH TALIBAN BUT NO RESULTS YET.

The first round of peace talks between Pakistani government and Taliban committee have finished now. The Taliban committee has told the media that the talks went well but the increase in suicide attacks and the target killings of civilians and security personnel paint a gloomy and different pictures.

The Pakistani government and Taliban apologists have always claimed that the talks are for peace within the country. Really? Were the suicide attacks on polio workers and hand grenades being hurled at a cinema in Peshawar for peace? Do Pakistanis need that kind of peace? The Taliban disowned and condemned the attacks, apparently to kill two birds with one stone; to continue the talks process only in name so as to be protected from US drones and kill those who were ever involved in any action against them. This provided every opportunity to Taliban apologists to blame the attacks on a third force.

There has been no US drone strike or the targeting of any notorious terrorist figure during the talks so far. Then why are civilians and security personnel frequently being attacked? Taliban apologists have no answer to this. The Taliban has ultimately lost patience and has claimed suicide attack in Karachi on day before yesterday. Taliban apologists will certainly not be affected by this confession as their conscience has been dead a long time. They love their life and this world so much that they cannot even blame the terrorists for pushing the so-called talks towards failure.

There have surfaced, through the Pakistani and the foreign media, the three preconditions by the Taliban for the talks. These conditions if met would render the sacrifices of 50 thousand civilians and thousands of security personnel in the war on terror wasted leaving this country with a Taliban proposed government.

These are just the preconditions at the very onset of the talks. It is believed that there are more than four thousand Taliban inmates in Pakistani prisons. Suppose they are all released but the talks fail, would our security forces be able to catch them again/ have we ever contemplated how the state of Pakistan will handle the situation if half of them then return as suicide bombers/ this time the infamous Lal Mosque cleric a Maulana threatened the state of Pakistan when he said that the Taliban has 500 female suicide bombers in a bid to have all the Taliban conditions met.

Talk of peace with these preconditions never produce results. Unproductive Indo-Pak  talks are a glaring example. The Taliban preconditions for the talks portray the same picture. The Taliban preconditions are nothing more than an effort to revive and strengthen the militant organization.

The word “Pakistan” means the land of pure people. Are the terrorists the pure people? The terrorists brand of religion and their acts are anti-pakistan and anti Islamic. Pakistan and the terrorists cannot coexist. Pakistan has no place for the terrorists. The Taliban preconditions for the talks imply that they want their demands fulfilled by force and a on every level. The Pakistani government’s  so called peace talks  initiative is a desirous experiment and sets a precedent that the state will hold talks with those forces that are capable of killing maximum civilians and security personnel. It is time that the federal government and Taliban apologists decide whether they want Pakistan to be the land of the pure or the land of the terrorists.

COLD WAR BETWEEN USA & RUSSIA

THE NEW COLD WAR BETWEEN USA & RUSSIA

The Russian positions that have kept the upper hand, not to mention that Putin saved Obama from yet  another Middle East war. As Syria was a Russian win, no wonder Washington dreams of a win in Ukraine. We can interpret what’s going, on now as a remix of the 2004 Orange Revolution. But the big picture goes way back – from NATO’s expansion in the 1990s to American NGOs trying to destabilize Russia, NATO’s first with Georgia, and those missile defence schemes so close to Russian borders.

The new cold war  same as the old cold war. Same but different one day it is the myriad implications of Washington’s pivoting to Asia, as in the containment of China the next day, it is the perennial attempt to box Russia in. never a dull moment in the New Great Game in Eurasia. On Russia the denigration of all things Sochi- to the inherent stupidity of Western corporate media standards, was just a subplot of the main show, which  always gets personal; the relentless demonization of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

US think Tankland now also peddles the notion that the Obama is expertly adept at a balance of power strategy. To include Libya as part of this strategy is a sick  joke; Libya post Gaddafi is a failed state courtesy of humanitarian bombing by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Meanwhile, in Syria the US strategy boils down to let Aras kill Arabs in droves.

Iran is way more complex. Arguably the Obama administration calculates that through talks between Iran and the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council plus Germany. It will be able to outmaneuver the Russians, who are close to Tehran. This assuming the Obama administration really wants a nuclear deal with Iran that would later release the floodgates of Western world.

The US strategy rules that street protests should lead to regime change. It applies to the Ukraine, but it does not apply to Thailand. Washington wants regime change in the Ukraine for one reason only; in the wider new Great Game in Eurasia context that would be the rough equivalent of Texas defecting from the US and becoming a Russian ally. Still this gambit is bound to fail. Moscow has myriad ways to deploy economic leverage in Ukraine; it has access to much better Intel than the Americans; and the protester/gangs are just a noisy minority.

Washington tough won’t give up, as it sees both the political crises in Ukraine as the emerging financial crisis in Kazakhstan as opportunities to threaten Moscow’s economic/strategic interests. It is as if the Beltway was praying for a widespread financial crisis in the Russia led Customs Union Russia Kazakhstan and Belarus, pray in fact is all they have got while the EU, for the entire grandiose, theoretical wishful thing, remains a divided mess.

Iran Nuclear Deal with World Powers

Iran, world powers aim for final nuclear deal

Iran and world powers embark Tuesday on the Herculean task of transforming an interim nuclear deal into a long-term accord satisfying all sides and silencing talk of war for good.

After a decade of failure and rising tensions, US president has put the chances of such an agreement at not more than 50-50 while Iranian foreign minister has predicted difficult discussion.

It comes after foreign ministers struck a deal in Geneva on November last year of 2013 and saw Iran agree to curb – for six months – some of its nuclear activities in exchange for minor relief from painful sanctions.

The agreement which came  into force on January this year 2014 extends the theoretical break out time needy by Iran which denies seeking the bomb to produce enough highly enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon.

In return Iran is due to get over the six months some billion of money in sanctions relief including 3$ billion in assets frozen in overseas bank accounts.

Iran’s nuclear freeze is  only temporary although it can be extended and the bulk of UN and Western sanctions remain continuing to deprive Iran of billions of dollars in oil revenues every week.

Under the comprehensive deal now being sought which the parties aim to conclude and commence implementing by November the powers will want Iran to scale back its activities permanently.

In exchange Iran would see  all UN Security council , US and EU sanctions lifted.

The deal might include the closure of Iran’s facility slashing the number of centrifuges enriching uranium cutting its stockpile of fissile material and altering a new reactor being built Arak.

This plus tighter UN inspections would not remove entirely Iran’s capability to get the bomb but would make it substantially more difficult. According to US president it would be impossible.

But how such a deal goes down  with hardliners in the United States and in Israel, the Middle East’s sole if undeclared nuclear power and also with Sunni Arab monarchies in the Gulf remains to be seen.

I think both sides would be willing to make compromises to meet the bottom lines of the other side. The trouble is that both sides have hard men outside the negotiating room who have to be satisfied.

Iranian President called last week for the talks to be fair and constructive, while Tehran has laid out a series of red lines including refusing to close down any nuclear facilities or to stop medium level enrichment.

Taliban & Women of Tribal Areas

Taliban & Women of Tribal Areas

Now a days Pakistan is preparing to define the parameters of talks with the Taliban, but here some questions and concert are missing about Tribal Area’s women. The specifically the question of women in the FATA has so far been omitted from the discourse in the mainstream of Pakistani media. During the past tenure FATA has largely been limited to drone attacks martyrs versus non-martyrs, the US led war or our own war military operations and the subsequent displacement of large number of internationally displaced persons. The human side of this war especially its gender effects is rarely discussed in Pakistani media. The miseries of women in FATA because of mass migration internal displacement, rape abuse and killings in this war have received little attention our sympathy. No help is available for women widowed or sexually abused, and their children semi-orphaned during this war.

Women and the children in camps and different villages are traumatized but because of conservative cultural norms and traditions, they cannot seek help or counseling. Women are less likely to share their burdens however and have learnt to dull their feelings and remain silent.

the Taliban’s foremost ideological agenda seemed to be annihilation of educational institutions by the Taliban were coupled with girls being banned from attending schools. There are news reports that the remaining schools were taken over by the army as base camps. According to a FATA official nearly 500 schools were bombed in recent years. With less than three percent literacy rate among FATA women the destruction of infrastructure and forcefully stopping girls from going to school has further affected the lives of women in one of the poorest region in the world.

The education sector suffers from bombing of schools by the Taliban, the health sector has also had a major setback in the targeting of polio workers in the region of Pakistan. The already non-existent health infrastructure in Federal Tribal Areas has 50 hospitals of its estimated seven million population. There is one bed for every 2500 people as compared to 1500 in the rest of Pakistan. For a population of 1890 only one doctor is available and a mere 45 percent of people have access to safe drinking water. The Taliban banned women and children cannot visit health clinics, thus affecting their health and wellbeing. During Taliban sharia rule in Afghanistan, many women died of minor ailments because of their restricted mobility and the added restriction that women could only by treated by female doctors. The Taliban control in FATA has created a system that runs parallel to the one already operating albeit dysfunctionally, making it more oppressive and further subjugating women in the region. The recent development of talks with the Taliban and the subsequent demand of Taliban imposed sharia ignored the question of women. In fact they ignore the lives of people in FATA. Does this means that the impending imposition of officials sharia will replace the old system operating in FATA. Will imposition of sharia with state blessing acknowledge the basic rights of women/ will women’s right to education, health care and free movement are ensued?

All these basic concerns of the women  in FATA who are already burq-clad, have restricted mobility and are suppressed in the name of patriarchy should be addressed if we want to talk about durable solutions in the region. Women become the worst victims of war and the biggest stakeholders of peace. How does our country expect a return to peace when women, who are already a part of the marginalized system, will be further persecuted with state blessings rule and their treatment of women are visible next door to us. Ignoring the question of women and their stake in the possible imposition of the Taliban version of sharia in FATA in our dialogue with the Taliban  rule and their treatment of women are visible next door to  us. Ignoring the question of women and their stake in the possible imposition of the Taliban version of sharia in FATA in our dialogue with that Taliban is criminal neglected and one that our liberals are quit about since achieving peace is a desperate priority for the state. Recently the senate passes a resolution asking the government to protect the rights of women and minorities in the peace talks but how is that resolution extendible or binding on the government when FATA outside the jurisdiction of parliament?