The Drone Worth

The worth of drone base in a Country

Those inside and outside the US administration who have thought hardest about what is and is not being accomplished by a US military presence in Afghanistan keep coming back to a different reason. That we need that presence to provide enough security to operate unmanned aerial vehicles from Afghanistan and perhaps to do enough for other aspects of Afghan security so that the government of Afghanistan will permit the continued operation of the drone from Afghan soil, and we need the drones to keep whacking at terrorists next door in Pakistan.

One is to confuse availability of use with desirability of use. The drone strikes often have been considered the only game in town in term soft getting at undesirables in the wilds of Waziristan. But this in effect means that because the tool we happened to  have is a hammer and a very nifty hammer at that, not only do things start looking like nails, but we also feel an uncontrollable urge to keep pounding, whether or not pounding is apt to do us more good than harm. Another pattern is to confuse ends and means.

We are not using a particular lethal too to say, provide security and stability in a country. We are trying to provide enough security and stability in a country to be able to use the top, there was some similar ends/means confusion earlier in the war in discussion about the role of NATO. An instrument for doing something such as fighting a war but some of the discussion was about how the war ought to be fought to maintain the health of the alliance.

Finally there is a disproportionate focus on a trees rather than the forest. Extending an entire overseas military expedition for the sake of being able to use one weapon system in one particular area is an extraordinary deference to the tree while losing sight of the forest. Publically stated rationales for foreign wars often diverge at least partly from the real reasons in the minds of policy maker. But thinking about public reactions can be useful check on the direction of non public thinking and whether it is exhibiting to  much of the sorts of the fallacies mentioned above. 

Taliban in Afghanistan

Will Taliban take over in Afghanistan?

After this year the last remaining British and American troops will put out of Afghanistan. From the end of this year Afghanistan will be on its own. No matter how bad things get, no American or British government will come back to help. So once the Afghanistan national forces are left largely to their own devices, will they be able to cope with the challenge? or will the Taliban win the war and control Afghanistan as they did from 1996 to 2001?

Nowadays the Afghan army and police are an impressive body of men who have been thoroughly trained and show a real pride in themselves. Their equipment is first class and their commanders are selected on the basis of ability. They are as different from the feeble, unwilling Afghan soldiers and policeman. The Taliban found it relatively easy to beat the mujahedeen government and they managed to convince sizeable numbers of uncommitted warlords they were going to win, and won them over their side. Today Afghanistan is a different country, there is more and more money around it and it seems altogether more advanced. Corruption is everywhere, especially in government but no one who remembers the disastrous years of Taliban rule, when corruption reached new heights is likely to believe the Taliban will be any better.

As part of the price for the deal, the new president will have to introduce more Islamic practices. But whether the West likes it or not, the Taliban represent an important element in the makeup of Afghanistan. If there is to be any kind of peace, it will be impossible to exclude them altogether. As the withdrawal of British, American and other forces from Afghanistan draws closer, the Taliban and their allies are raising the number of their attacks. Their aims is clearly to give the impression they have driven the foreign troops out. 

The Prosperity of US vs China

THE PROSPERITY OF CHINA VERSUS THE IMPERIAL OF US.

If the US Empire to remain the first of global military powers in a way that is beyond challenge, it has no choice but to keep China down. There is an unavoidable contradiction between US military dominance and Chinese economic development. Moreover even China’s economic power by itself is at odds with the hegemonic man oeuvres of the US Sanctions on sovereign nations, embargoes and blockades by the US will not work if China is willing to trade with the threatened nations. This forecloses US economic control of other weaker nations.

American exceptional-ism is missionary; it insists that all the world be like us. One can see one of the most fanatic incarnations of that in Hillary Clinton and other humanitarian, imperialists, many regarding themselves as progressives. China’s exceptional-ism, on the other hand, is a high self-regard for its culture but no desire to spread it. If the rest of us do not want to follow the Chinese way then we have missed out and it is not business of the Chinese to change that in their view.

However there is no necessary conflict between the two nations, china and the US or the two peoples. The prosperity of China does not preclude a high level of prosperity in the US Economic development and prosperity is not a zero sum game. As the Chinese repeat at every turn, there can be a win and win situation for all nations of the World with China’s development. That has already proven true in the present great recession where the Chinese economy has been the main driver of the global economy, perhaps preventing the great recession from tumbling into the great depression.

Furthermore the United States is in no danger from a powerful China. We are separated by a vast ocean from China and the power of nuclear weapons make a challenge to US sovereignty impossible except on a suicidal basis. But the US remains a largely self sufficient economy with resources aplenty. Only severe paranoia could lead us to fear economically prosperous china and more than that as lay many others points.

That was true even in the early 15^th Century when China was the greatest naval power in the world, sailing giant ships to Africa and elsewhere long before Columbus set foot on a ship. There was trading but no conquest and no enslavement. Conquest and enslavement turned out to be the work of European civilization. Even now with the China the second largest economy in the world it has not a single overseas military base even though it provides more UN peacekeeper personnel than any other nation.

The bloody history of US over the last century is quite a different matter. If the United States insists on its status as the dominant and unchallengeable military power, then we are  on the road to conflict, certainly a new Cold War the beginning of which  the pivot represents and quite possibly we are on the road to WWIII. We in the United States are the ones who can control this and perhaps save the world from the very worst suffering and deadly conflict.

The answer of all of this is to abandon Empire, dismantle to end our occupation of foreign nations, including South Korea, Japan and Germany etc. adopt a defensive strategy to protect our land and come home. Trade and talk yes. Military intervention, but no. we have potential partner for peace in China. Let them give it a try establish trust and verify it. Finally a paradise awaits us here. So let us leave other in peace to constructor their own. 

Dr. Abdus Salam Pakistani Scientist

Dr. Abdus Salam a Role Model for Young People 

Dr. Abdus Salam is a role model not only for young Pakistani scientists but also for youth around the world. His immense contribution towards the development of the theory of Unification of Forces is just one of several remarkable achievements he made in the world of scientific knowledge and institutional development. His contribution is cherished worldwide by scientist and none-scientists alike. Being a Pakistani, and a student of science, he is known much about this real hero of Pakistan until last year.

Abdus Salam is still counted among the world’s most influential physicists and as the founder of the Theoretical Physics Group at the Imperial college of London; he is revered and remembered by a large community of scientists. His name resurfaced in 2012 after the discovery of a subatomic particle known as the Higg-Boson. This discovery, the biggest in the world of physics in the last 30 years, vindicated Salam’s major theories and predictions. His works provided a crucial link between the pioneering work of Peter Higgs and the physical proof of the particle.

The legacy of Dr. Salam is rich both on the side of scientific knowledge and in the form of the institutions he established, having a strong impact on the world of science. Realizing the need for the uplift of young scientists in developing countries he established the international centre for theoretical physics in Trieste, Italy in 1964.

In the capacity of scientific adviser to the government of Pakistan between 1960  and 1974, Abdus Salam played a key role in Pakistan’s science infrastructure and become the guiding spirit and founder of Pakistan’s nuclear programme as well as the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission and the Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission.

Abdus Salam’s life offers the best role model to the young people of the world by knowing about his hard work and love for his human being, can aspire to achieve excellence. 

Military Operation by Pakistan Against Taliban

Military operation against Taliban by Pakistani government

The Mulana of a political party of Pakistan opposed a military operation against the Taliban and said the government of Pakistan does not seem serious for dialogue with the Taliban. A military operation will never resolve the problems but it multiplies them. He said that dialogue with the Taliban was the only way to restore peace in the country. Another hand Bilawal Zardar the son of assassinated prime minister  Benzair Bhutto has also urged the military operation against Taliban. By criticizing Nawaz Sharif’s government in Pakistan for its failure to come up with a clear stance on the issue, said by the JUI leader. They believe that the US wants to wage a conflict between the Taliban and Pakistan military. He urged the government of Pakistan to announce a ceasefire and work for a peaceful solution to the problems. Pakistan could not remain indifferent to the situation in Afghanistan and added that events occurring in the neighboring country and KP have far reaching impacts on the entire world. It is noted that future decisions to be taken should not be based simply on the internal situation of Pakistan but they should be made keeping in view the regional situation. 

Taliban Attack on Tourists

Pakistani Taliban attacks on Tourists

The Pakistani Taliban may be planning attacks on tourists in Gilgit-Baltistan and Chitral, where 10 foreign climbers were killed by shooting last years.

Thousands of tourists visit Gilgit and Chitral each year, many drawn by the area’s impressive mountains and glaciers, including the world’s second highest peak K2. Pakistan has seen a surge in militant attacks in recent weeks and official are warning these may spread to the north as the sprint tourist season gets under way. Therefore, Pakistani Taliban may  strike the region.

Pakistan has warned of suicide bombings and attacks on tourists in the region. The climbing industry in northern Pakistan was badly hit by the attacks on foreign mountaineers at the foot of Pakistan’s second highest mountain, Nanga Parbat in June last year. According the regional Police, it is said that there were not aware of any specific threat by the Pakistan Taliban but were remaining vigilant. They have enhanced security as part of a routine exercise, keeping in mind the latest bout of violence throughout the country. 

The 1967 Arab-Israeli War

Arab & Israeli War 1967

There were also many nations, several governments have raised & sign periodically on the planet and also destroyed many nations. They celebrated their victory and have left their name on the pages of history. The nation who worked the same height as it has obtained its results. When we look at the world's major nations on the history of Israel, but the story seems a bloody war the persecution narrative dagger, see sword less and selfishness and mean idolatry. It is the nation whose God sent many prophets and messengers for their guidance, but they still could not change themselves. They gave the wound to his father's heart in the beginning, and they fell their brother Yousaf into the well and sell it to the market as slaves in Egypt. Today, Israel is a small country has become so daring that he aggressively attacked all over the Arab countries. Whether Israel had the courage to do it for Arab, or there were only foreign strong powers behind him. Being a weak power, we are comfortable that this misery Help us strength in that time of trouble and will be over soon. We see that war destroys the beautiful city having fire, fire and iron bombing like rain from the sky looks, but just the other side are not even any decision, even the warring nations fighting the result is exposed and only meeting are to be held during war. It's due to the disagreement amongst Muslim countries. If Muslim countries have been formed, under a formula and agreed on the principle of joint defense and common technology then there is no amount of power in the world who can match against them.Western forces were free of shipping on the high seas and want to Aqaba, but their goal was to send the goods to African and Asian countries and oil-derived raw materials should be taken from these countries. For this purpose Israel needed the economic and military requirements. His second goal was the port of Eilat and widening their warships and submarines that should be able to stand here and be a constant threat for the Arabs. This was the third major oil pipelines that extend from the Gulf of Aqaba to the Mediterranean ports in occupied Palestine should be taken to the United Arab Republic, passing through the Suez Canal revenue from oil planes on which some profit had revenues could finish from it.

Even before Israel, had invaded on behalf of France and Britain with whole power aggressively on the Suez Canal and heaven shells from the sky to the Arab Republic. The only thing is that President Nasser's nationalization of the Suez Canal was decided.

The attention able thing was that instead of the Suez Canal in Egypt was located in the UK or Europe & Excavation work was carried out by workers by the European labours. Were the Europeans buried the bones of their elderly here? Definitely not. Egypt is a part of the Suez Canal and only Egyptian workers who had worked for it excavation. The European countries had put money into the construction of tens of years until the Egyptian people had benefited from his interest from this loan which was repaid back with interest by paying.

Suez Canal was in Egypt right now and only had President Nasser's nationalization of the canal which had taken bold action in the best interest of the Egyptians. The result was announced the nationalization of the Suez Canal as a shell fell and there was panic all over Europe. Now there was the same condition of  Gulf of Aqaba, Jordan,  Aqaba is located in the area of Jordan. Even when blockade as soon as, was announced, then from the UK, the U.S. and Israel were threatening to break the blockade of Aqaba. The Strait Aviation is located in the Middle East, it was the Arabs that the Arabs have a right to keep it open or to blockade.

There were also many forms of this water highway from which many works could be taken from it. For this purpose, the problems could be solved through agreements or conversations but it did not scare and the Arabs were intimidated by threatening by them. When there was no result. It was accepted by Arabs and they had to go head out–to-cloth tied to protect their rights. President Nasser refused to alter his stance and spoken words that would maintain the blockade of Aqaba and the Straits Aviation. Jordan had the right to run his own ship and has the right to live freely. This right cannot lose from any power to the Arabs. This was the second impressive victory of President Nasser. If Arabs will be proud of it but much less.